M23 Threatens to Capture Kisangani as FARDC Stretches Out Thin

I would support you but you are always bias against M23! Saying the terrain of DRC doesn't allow M23 to capture Kisangani this means what exactly? Didn't you know they had Walikale more than 1 year ago and voluntary withdrew to give peace a chance ? That's wasn't far from Kisangani if their intentions was capturing it they would have done it way before they even take over Goma.

Propangada at best.<br>Do you know where kisangani is ?<br>All kamikaze drones kagame sent, they were shot down. In military term , this tell you that kisangani is well protected.<br>Let them try. <br>RDF/m23/afc are having difficulty in congo..They can resort to terroiste act but they will not success. <br>USA is in the game now<br>we are approaching last days of Savimbi.<br>If you know history , you sould know how the angola strong rebel was killed.<br>He was much strong then rdf/m23.

The drone attacks were not even from M23 they were sent by Central African Republic .RDF soldiers doing peace treating missions over there sent the drones as they saw M23 loosing on the ground but they made Nanga take credit for it.There will be a United Nation meeting soon that will expose this.Thats why the African Union labelled it a Terrorist attack because Fardc has proof of where the drones were actually launched from it wasn&#39;t in the DRC.

The war is over M23 are trying to hide embarrassment by still talking tough they have lost this war and there supreme leader is have a mental breakdown infront of the world kagame won&#39;t stop talking and dry snitching on people if it&#39;s not Uganda his snitching on its the west who made him do all this dirt and they are now menacing him😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

Various International sources confirm reports about cruelties on civilians perpetrated by Congolese forces &amp; Wazalendo militias.<br> This has made M23 popular and a better option among the population of of Eastern Congo. DRC government can not hide behind US support for ever.

Bonified ,The M23–RDF axis is playing a dangerously reckless game. They seem to assume that Washington’s calm and measured diplomatic tone implies weakness or control on their side, but that is a serious strategic misreading. Once the RDF withdraws and leaves M23 to fight independently—as the DRC and multiple observers have long alleged—the balance of power shifts dramatically, and the rebellion’s sustainability becomes highly questionable.<br><br>On the diplomatic front, Félix Tshisekedi has arguably outmaneuvered Kagame. Kagame’s repeated fixation on Félix increasingly sounds less like strategic critique and more like visible frustration. Félix understood a critical reality early on: this war could not be decisively won through military means alone. Instead, he internationalized the conflict, reframed the narrative, and leveraged global diplomatic pressure—transforming the battlefield into a political and diplomatic arena where Rwanda is far more vulnerable.<br><br>Félix’s current posture is calculated. If M23 were to capture another major city or strategic town, the geopolitical optics would force Washington to act in some capacity. The United States cannot afford to appear passive in the face of a major territorial collapse by a UN-recognized government. While boots on the ground are highly unlikely, Washington still possesses significant leverage—sanctions, diplomatic isolation, military aid adjustments, and covert pressure mechanisms. As Boulos implied, “there are strings we can pull”—and those strings can be decisive.

M23 has a right to confront their security threats at their sources and this includes Kisangani where the drones are launched from. If Bujumbura airport is used in launching drones as well, it should be jammed as they did before capturing goma airport.