Phala Phala Saga | Speaker's choice to not oppose president’s interdict not correct: Legal Expert

South Africa's political landscape is once again focused on the long-running Phala Phala saga, with the National Assembly's impeachment committee having held its first sitting this past Thursday.

The committee is expected to oppose President Cyril Ramaphosa's urgent court application to halt its work, while he challenges the Section 89 independent panel report that found prima facie evidence of possible constitutional violations and misconduct.

At the same time, the African Transformation Movement (ATM), which originally lodged the impeachment complaint, has vowed to challenge what it describes as attempts by the President to delay parliamentary accountability.

The developments have reignited debate about the powers of Parliament, the rights of a sitting president to seek judicial relief, and the broader implications for South Africa's constitutional democracy.

To unpack the legal and political implications, we are joined by Legal Expert and Group CEO of ius Group, Benedict Phiri.

For more news, visit sabcnews.com and #SABCNews on all Social Media platforms.