Neil deGrasse Tyson and Richard Dawkins Discuss Science, Religion & Evolution - Vidnexa
Create Account
VidNexa
Up next
 
00:00 / 00:00
QualityAutochevron_right
Playback speedchevron_right
Audio trackchevron_right
Chapterschevron_right
Autoplay On
Loop Off
Sticky player Off
Sleep timerOffchevron_right
Subtitles/CC On
Stats for nerds
Sleep timer ended
⏪ 10s
⏩ 10s

Neil deGrasse Tyson and Richard Dawkins Discuss Science, Religion & Evolution

7.3M views • 2 weeks ago
Vidnexa
4 subscribers
100 Comments
@supercorpus652
@@supercorpus6522 weeks ago
Vim do futuro em 2026 para dizer que estou lendo e adorando. Sou do Brasil. No momento escapamos de uma ditadura sangrenta do ditador Bolsonaro. Grande parte da população está doente pela exposição massiva a charlatanismo via redes sociais. A doutrinação se tornou uma arma eficiente de guerra. Infelizmente o exército dos EUA e a Cia estam mandando dinheiro para o Brasil para libertar Bolsonaro e tentar eleger seu filho Flávio Bolsonaro o objetivo é tomar as reservas de terras raras de 3 trilhões de dólares do país. Luis Inácio Lula da Silva segue na liderança da resistência. Se perdermos nossa soberania entraremos em um guerra civil que vai colapsar a Amazônia como um todo. Americanos e americanas de bem por favor divulguem nossa causa. Obrigado e um grande abraço a todos. Recentemente Leonardo di Caprio veio ao Brasil para entender a grave situação e tentar de alguma maneira evitar a destruição do Brasil e da Amazônia pela família do ditador Bolsonaro.
@LandonParker-x5u5p
@@LandonParker-x5u5p2 weeks ago
As a protestant, I would respectfully disagree. As far as I remember, they put focus on the process of evolution rather than how it started. Once it gets going, I can understand that changes can arise from seemingly random mutations or new environments. But I struggle to understand how random processes can start that loop. To me, it's like knocking over a jigsaw puzzle and seeing the puzzle solved on the floor. That just never happens. And like they established, we are far more complex than any jigsaw puzzle. Also my faith wasn't just informed by evolution. I've put thought into the scope beyond it, focusing on the laws of physics and the nature of our universe. There's at least 25 universal constants, and if any one of them were different by the slightest conceivable measure, life would cease to exist. For example, the fine structure constant is a dimensionless value approximately equal to 1/137. It directly measures the electromagnetic forces between elementary particles as a constant ratio. If it were even slightly smaller, atoms wouldn't have the strength to bond and form compounds, and therefore water and by exstension life could not exist. If it were slightly larger, electrons would be too tightly bound to the atomic nuclei to form shared electron clouds. That means atoms physically can't interact, and again compounds cannot exist. My sources include but are not limited to: God's crime scene from J. Warner Wallace, Mere christianity from C.S Lewis, and the channel IMBeggar.
<br>
<br>So sorry for the massive comment. I just find these topics engaging, and I&#39;m not here to argue or judge by any means. I&#39;m in the same boat as you are.
@tituswillow
@@tituswillow2 weeks ago
DR Neil Tyson I truly love the way you teach. A gentle inspiration to us all
@tituswillow
@@tituswillow2 weeks ago
“We are poor judges of what’s important for survival”. Brilliant!
@DCBiscuit
@@DCBiscuit2 weeks ago
Metal Gear Rising Revengeance: &quot;Memes... the DNA of the soul and the genes of culture!&quot; <br>Thanks, Kojima!
@vamsihas168
@@vamsihas1682 weeks ago
@StarTalk<br>I don&#39;t understand why you guys don&#39;t see the combined picture of everything, instead of just the evolution part,<br>you know I don&#39;t disagree with the evolution theory, but let&#39;s just say it happened like this, <br>god didn&#39;t just sit and create every creature one by one. he just commanded with his word that,<br>at first, he said like here you go matter or space or time or all of you - I command you to come into existence,<br>and then he commanded for the water and the vegetations[seeds] to come into existence,<br>and then he said like- all of the living creatures, I command you to come into existence.<br>And right when he said that it started with a simple cell and then all the way to the mammals is formed one by one, step by step, exactly the evolution as you say.<br>And I think that this evolution had happened in a rather perhaps faster way than a slow process and then it stopped when it reached its limit or I&#39;d like to say it reached its 100% progress and finished. <br>And all of these of survival of the fittest, other evolution theories would come into action only after all of the creatures had been created.<br>I would prefer to call these as post creational adjustments instead of evolution.<br>That&#39;s why it explains why doesn&#39;t monkeys no more transform into humans, if at all evolution is still going on!!
@Notyelfox
@@Notyelfox2 weeks ago
Frankly, unless the reasonability that science offer is beyond my comprehension, when I listen to these programs it strengthens my belief in God even more.
@RayRay-x9p
@@RayRay-x9p3 weeks ago
Dawkins is 100% correct in how he handles religion and religious people. Religion will be humanity’s downfall and needs to be erased across the board. Imagine where we could be without it.
@dominicbritt
@@dominicbritt3 weeks ago
Fantastic.
@Deckkardian
@@Deckkardian3 weeks ago
quite annoying to watch professor dawkins when he doesnt annoyed someone 😭
@Will_14_years_ago
@@Will_14_years_ago3 weeks ago
I remember when we were kids and Isaac Newton would tell me how he had planned to burn his house down with his mother in it. Other than that he was a pretty normal introverted hermit with murderous tendencies. He attempted to erase hooke from history he manipulated the system to make sure he was crowned inventing calculus not liebnitz and forced flamsteed to publish his lifes work for his own gain. Good guy with a few downsides to him.
@myseventhgradescienceteach9953
@@myseventhgradescienceteach99533 weeks ago
Yet we still don&#39;t know how life began and what about the vastness of the universe? Why and how and for what?
@aquarius8k56
@@aquarius8k563 weeks ago
what is the spring/dynamo within that keeps the human body alive and in motion ..?
@sajhaider4503
@@sajhaider45033 weeks ago
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPh0LOCWT5A&amp;t=1305">21:45</a> great fictional storytelling
@hemendraparikh7645
@@hemendraparikh76453 weeks ago
Just as science accepts random the religions accept the creator. Nothing more nor less.
@rayc5577
@@rayc55773 weeks ago
If the human body needs BLOOD and the HEART (which is a muscle that doesn’t get fatigued), I just need one these 2 peas brain to tell me which one they think came first…the heart or blood??
@oemfernandes
@@oemfernandes3 weeks ago
Both could talk with the designer and yet not believe in it :)
@AudunSjoli
@@AudunSjoli3 weeks ago
Roger Penrose 🙏
@rayc5577
@@rayc55773 weeks ago
The Bible spoke of scoffers and mockers
@MatthewChambersMusic
@@MatthewChambersMusic3 weeks ago
Yay! Class of 76! Me too! Carter! Small universe!
@rb7685
@@rb76853 weeks ago
This is proof that intelligence and education are far removed from wisdom. These are two very intelligent men who are absolutely clueless as to the nature of creation and the purpose of the creation of our world. They are immoral faithless and are like boats drifting out on the ocean with no anchor in no direction. All that intelligence, and nowhere to go
@legendantonopoulos5873
@@legendantonopoulos58734 weeks ago
Is it me or does Richard sound like A older Stewie Griffan 😂😂😂
@waynelemieux5111
@@waynelemieux51114 weeks ago
So why didn’t we develop night vision like some animals?
@Smokahontas77
@@Smokahontas774 weeks ago
Just wanna put this out there. Double rainbow guy was tripping on hallucinogenic drugs when he saw the rainbow.
@CrezymedJohn
@@CrezymedJohn4 weeks ago
To clarify, richard dawkins is not a scientist. He cannot explain the complexity of natures include living beings in this planet. He just invent his own science definitions, concept, theories, which are all already debunked. Many books of rebuttal of his view, especially on evolution had been available. Some countries exclude evolution theory in their schools curriculum due to its nature of not-a-real-science. Richard is now a rich people so whatever sh*t he said, people will admire and respect him. Only open mind people can avoid the trap of his misleading pseudoscience.
@ilovecoffebreaks9822
@@ilovecoffebreaks98224 weeks ago
I like Tyson, but sometimes (oftentimes) it is too much Tyson and too little of the guest. Dawkins has a lot to say, but he doesn&#39;t get much of a chance.
@ndis1977
@@ndis19774 weeks ago
Absolutely top-tier discussion. Seriously, no fluff here—this is better than almost everything else on the internet right now.
@pofacknamaki
@@pofacknamaki4 weeks ago
Evolution by Darwin is totally wrong! All molecules move from high concentration to low concentration and this is why evolution by Darwin would not be possible!(شاپرک)
@podcastwhopedd
@@podcastwhopedd4 weeks ago
valid
@ThomasHEarl
@@ThomasHEarl1 months ago
Neil is my dawg, I see where he&#39;s coming from and really shed light on so many subjects. Thank you Sir.
@jimhart5964
@@jimhart59641 months ago
As I understand it, there are documented cases of big jumps in evolution. Not everything is little steps.
@zaidseni
@@zaidseni1 months ago
Can we measure the IQ of natural selection/evolution process?!
@jshadowx404
@@jshadowx4041 months ago
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPh0LOCWT5A&amp;t=2380">39:40</a>
@patbrennan6572
@@patbrennan65721 months ago
Your closing comments at the end was the cherry on top of a wonderful discussion Neil , Thank you for inviting the one and only Mr Richard Dawkins on StarTalk .
@patrickengle9344
@@patrickengle93441 months ago
Humans were the product of genetic engineering just as humans genically engineer plant life, fused chromosomes can only survive through genetic engineering by higher life forms likely from unknown plantets not yet discovered by human life on earth.
@georgecreel6960
@@georgecreel69601 months ago
Which came first the chicken or the egg the egg came first because before chickens evolve dinosaurs were laying eggs evolution is one of the slowest process we know of
@davidv-2
@@davidv-21 months ago
Yeah, the small changes in evolution really make sense.<br>Take the eyes and ears, for example. The first creatures that blossomed out of whatever, were practically blind and deaf (which made survival almost impossible). Then we guess over billions of years, real small genetic changes resulted in the marvels of seeing and hearing. Yeah, right, super logical.
@yoohanchoi8131
@@yoohanchoi81311 months ago
There is a higher power… No one can even begin to understand… Just be true to yourself.
@MatthewARoyal
@@MatthewARoyal1 months ago
I can stop believing in the God of the Bible tomorrow, and still couldn’t ever believe that we at product of blind pitiless indifference. There is no analog in our universe for systems, organisms, and processes to be the product of chance and random processes over time. Yet we adopt chance and randomness as the creative power behind everything?
@zeemonkee
@@zeemonkee1 months ago
There was the slightest pause after you finished talking to Dawkins at Beyond Belief, about a half a second. You are misremembering.
@wvp07
@@wvp071 months ago
Thank you for sharing such an interesting conversation. I came to eat, and you both served.<br><br>Side note <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPh0LOCWT5A&amp;t=2993">49:53</a> I understand what you are saying on a society level, Neil, but I agree with Richard. I, too, find it a waste of time to invest even a moment in the notion of their imaginary friend.
@twistodontis
@@twistodontis1 months ago
Makes me wonder did the fish that became human also somehow go under ground and be come something human like aswell 😮
@mrglockos
@@mrglockos1 months ago
I love the way Neil turns into an excitable big kid in the presence of Dawkin! 😂🙏🏼
@afrancisak
@@afrancisak1 months ago
Great work Sir
@attarehman6030
@@attarehman60301 months ago
Appendix definitely has some useful role in the body but our knowledge is limited to find the best role. As knowledge evolves so today we don’t know many things doesn’t mean we won’t know in future
@stevewilkes863
@@stevewilkes8631 months ago
We all have an unbroken lineage back to a single celled organism.
@AnnaKuśnierz-g8g
@@AnnaKuśnierz-g8g1 months ago
Thank you very much for this video 📚📖
@Ohilipp
@@Ohilipp1 months ago
I am one minute in and i am already smiling across my entire face for the good vibes and the atmosphere which is very much welcome on a day waking up from narcosis and pain! Thanks a bunch!
@GrahamAshton-t2z
@@GrahamAshton-t2z1 months ago
here is a picture of my grand father who lived a billion yaers ago <a href="UCkszU2WH9gy1mb0dV-11UJg/fish-orange-wide-eyes"></a>🤣
@BahaudinJadav-w3g
@@BahaudinJadav-w3g1 months ago
Do we have synthetic version of sativa &amp; indica for day and night on our planet.
@MrTimetravler
@@MrTimetravler1 months ago
As always Neal has to disrespect 😂
@wearsCube
@@wearsCube1 months ago
Preparing Elts Pakistan
@GeminiGrady
@@GeminiGrady1 months ago
😂😂😂😂😂WELL professor x and darwin 😂😂😂😂😂how about that well perhaps charles you had better use cyrebro to contact lylandra of the shi’ar empire and let her know that you and darwin will be coming to visit her by way of the x jet😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏾🙏🏾🫵🏽🫵🏾🫵🏽🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️😂😂😂😂😂👌👌🫡🫡I Am SURE THAT those wormholes will get you there a lot quicker say old chap😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🫵🏽👌👌🙏🏼🫵🏾🫵🏾🤔🤔🤔🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🫡🫡ENOUGH WITH THE COMEDY ALREADY 😂😂😂😂😂
@saeedgamal9201
@@saeedgamal92011 months ago
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPh0LOCWT5A&amp;t=1806">30:06</a>
@saeedgamal9201
@@saeedgamal92011 months ago
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPh0LOCWT5A&amp;t=726">12:06</a>
@saeedgamal9201
@@saeedgamal92011 months ago
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPh0LOCWT5A&amp;t=657">10:57</a>
@saeedgamal9201
@@saeedgamal92011 months ago
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPh0LOCWT5A&amp;t=392">06:32</a>
@costealucia5357
@@costealucia53571 months ago
A small role for pinky toes but essential for balance and lateral stability. But hey, is Dawkins....
@stronzer59
@@stronzer591 months ago
the gut microbiome is proof of design<br>a micro Universe of life forms living in acid?<br>made to digest real food, transfer minerals thru a lining?<br>then package the waste into cassettes?<br>the more we stray from Natural the worse our health.
@YOUARESOFT.
@@YOUARESOFT.1 months ago
NOBODY knows how humans came about
@ewanwhyte3078
@@ewanwhyte30781 months ago
The world is not that binary...<br><br>Yes it is ♥️
@marmitesmate
@@marmitesmate1 months ago
I could listen to these two great minds talk all day, I probably watch these videos far too much, and too often, it&#39;s a shame we can&#39;t evolve into a race of Dawkins and de Grasse Tyson&#39;s, what a world that would be.<br>The way I look at it is this, the only constant is entropy and decay, the dinosaurs, the neanderthals, now the homonids all faced extinction, I find it quit odd, that one of the most intelligent life forms that has ever existed, is running towards extinction, with both eyes open, destroying the very thing we need to exist, for profit and gain.<br>I see the human race as a life form that lives on a host (The Planet) takes more than it needs from it&#39;s host to survive, procreates without restriction, to the point that it&#39;s detrimental to the host, with no consideration of future generations, that&#39;s literally the definition of a parasite or a virus, except a virus evolves and mutates to a point where the host will survive, while we, not all but most, seem blind to the truth, through misinformation, spread by those who profit from our demise.<br>Have a brilliant day.
@cindymaceda2999
@@cindymaceda29991 months ago
AI will make people dumber until we become extinct. 😊
@importantjohn
@@importantjohn1 months ago
Who developed the mechanics / laws of evolution? And why?
@clauded.9821
@@clauded.98211 months ago
Two very educated men talking about if they go back far enough in there family tree on the first branche the ancestor they would be looking at is a fish .. I don&#39;t know about you but that&#39;s not the way i see it ... Naturally these guys don&#39;t believe in God Darwin himself before he died stopped believing in is own Theory and remember its a theory not a fact and if it hadn&#39;t been for Hinckley and other evolutionists pushing that theory it might not be so popular today .. Ok so lets say there is no God then what are we doing here what is our purpose just get born live for a while then die that&#39;s it something seems to be missing ... Luckily for us there is a Creator God the bible is our Owners Manual He Created Adam and Eve our first parents but with our Creator God we have a purpose he explains it to us in the bible our Owners Manual ... Probably most here will no believe in a Creator God who sent his son to die for us for our sins that we maybe able to repent when we do sin and have our sins forgiven by his sacrifice .. For those who believe there is a place you can go its called The Philadelphia Church of God everything is free no one will bother you for money its the true church of god now you know where to go just type it in ... May God bless you all...
@adrianh332
@@adrianh3321 months ago
Didn&#39;t know Dennett had died😢
@earthempath
@@earthempath1 months ago
As an artist who also loves science, I could see someone painting from an image from Hubble, as a way of exploring how it feels to be a part of something so vast. It’s a personal exploration, not meant for commercial viability
@earthempath
@@earthempath1 months ago
I live in the Sierra Madre mountains and recently saw and photographed a double rainbow. Even though I understand the science, I still feel awe for the incredible beauty of our planet 🌈🌈
@Hiauyang
@@Hiauyang1 months ago
the point is not to have deduced the idea, it is to have promoted it
@Tubarc
@@Tubarc1 months ago
Gosto da concepção simples Deus = Natureza. Mas, a Natureza não escreve livros, não promete terras, não pede guerras ou mortes em nome de um divino, não cria fronteiras, nem moedas, nem promete vidas após a morte. A vida já é um milagre onde os seres vivos são abençoados nas suas várias formas de existir. As religiões ajudaram muito o homem no desafio de mandar os filhos para a morte matando nas conquistas ou defesas da comunidade ameaçada. Com a criação da bomba atômica usada apenas duas vezes, as religiões viraram negócios e agora política com a bancada evangélica direto no congresso para garantir o dízimo em barras de ouro vindas direto do Ministério da Educação. Religião se tornou um negócio lucrativo garantindo o enriquecimento daqueles que lideram abusando a ignorância humana . . .Nós viemos ao mundo sem um manual de usuário e nem um serviço de atendimento ao consumidor, não tem devolução e nem reclamação. Aprendemos a respeitar a Natureza ainda quando bebês nos primeiros passinhos para dominar a GRAVIDADE e poder andar e correr. Aprendemos logo as consequências das quedas nos passinhos errados ignorando a leis básicas que regem a nossa existência, a simples gravidade. Ainda quando adultos tropeçamos para relembrar a nossa eterna lealdade com a MÃE NATUREZA.
@jared30
@@jared301 months ago
Is it possible that God is not a designer but is purely the logos. The logic that defines order from chaos? In that way is it so far fetched to say we are made in God&#39;s image. We have an an innate desire for truth and meaning and order out of chaos.
@rsm2342
@@rsm23421 months ago
Deep time is their god. What a joke. In this video, there is no real evidence talked about. Dawkins lives in a dream world and he loves to trick people into believing in ridiculous ideas.
@sylvesterpaulvalencia6955
@@sylvesterpaulvalencia69551 months ago
Are we the peak of our structure or we keep on changing over the course of time? And the other question is if atoms of living and non-living, then, what&#39;s the reason that changes the same atom that becomes stone to the same atom that becomes life, what&#39;s in between or forces that diverge along its creation why living emerges from non-living?
@sinivlogzz
@@sinivlogzz1 months ago
Mulavana spcl😂
@garyfoster3854
@@garyfoster38541 months ago
It must be a breath of fresh air for both of these fine gentlemen to have a conversation with a truly intelligent partner unlike most of the celebrities and religious yo-yos that interview them.
@shannonwaipouri1730
@@shannonwaipouri17301 months ago
Kiwi here guys parents are Catholics best parents ever never forced it on us it was our choice as our dad would say he encouraged us to ask questions and question things you don&#39;t understand
@InspirationalHotChocolat-be2ks
@@InspirationalHotChocolat-be2ks1 months ago
Lol we&#39;re a mutation from monkeys drinking radioactive water in Gabon for 2 billion years thanks to a natural fission reactor
@lance3155
@@lance31551 months ago
we are just biological robots powered by electricity
@KMMK2371
@@KMMK23711 months ago
Loved this episode!! Beautiful closing too!🥰
@TianLong-n9v
@@TianLong-n9v1 months ago
I love watching Neil podcasts,and somehow the guest Richard resembles Elon Musk’s mannerisms and even his voice a little,maybe I am right/wrong ,he gave me elons vibes in 10 secs watching 😅
@philipkdick2
@@philipkdick21 months ago
The concept of &quot;natural law&quot; was originated by Aristotle, and Thomas Aquinas applied it to the legal realm. Later, the School of Salamanca used it to justify liberty and what we now call human rights; this gave rise to the Laws of the Indies, which prohibited forced conversions and the seizure of native lands in the Americas—even granting the natives property titles issued by the Spanish Crown. Hume criticized the legal principle of natural law, and the theory of legal positivism subsequently emerged; however, that theory allowed almost everything the Austrian painter did in Germany to be legal, leading to the acceptance of certain natural law ideas after World War II...,
@philipkdick2
@@philipkdick21 months ago
Parmenides formulated the principle of identity—&quot;being is; non-being is not&quot;—and expressed it in a poem in which a goddess (perhaps Athena) revealed it to him. Heraclitus warned him that this philosophy was incapable of grasping motion and change. Parmenides concluded that &quot;being&quot; (that which is truly real in the universe) is infinite, eternal, and immutable. His science was what we now call Euclidean geometry (which views space as an infinite set of points); he concluded that motion cannot be rationally conceived and that, therefore, our senses deceive us. To support his ideas, he devised the paradoxes of Achilles and the tortoise and of the arrow remaining motionless in mid-air. Newton and Leibniz incorporated motion into physics using differential and integral calculus, but they approached the problem differently by focusing on the distance between two points rather than on individual points. This inability of Greek philosophy to conceptualize motion was part of the reason for the initial rejection of the theory of evolution, as the arguments raised against it were similar to those Parmenides used to deny the existence of motion...,
@philipkdick2
@@philipkdick21 months ago
The idea that the universe is eternal and immutable originates with Aristotle. Greek myths, however, generally speak of a beginning to the universe. The Church adopted Plato as the foundation for its theology, influenced by Neoplatonism and Augustine of Hippo. During the Late Middle Ages, the Arab philosophers Avicenna and Averroes rediscovered Aristotle and wrote commentaries on his work. Aristotle&#39;s writings were translated into Latin by Jewish translators in the Iberian Peninsula and subsequently spread throughout Europe. Thomas Aquinas adopted Aristotle as the basis for his theology, although he initially faced difficulties because Aristotle&#39;s writings had been declared heretical. Aquinas accepted the notion that the universe is immutable and eternal—existing within time. Augustine had already posited that God exists outside of time—a concept found in Book XII of <b>Confessions</b> (which also contains an argument against astrology, noting that in a Roman household, the master&#39;s son and a slave&#39;s son were born at the same moment). Consequently, Aquinas maintained that God created both the universe and time, a view consistent with the first chapter of Genesis. This belief in a universe that is eternal and immutable over time persisted until Hubble discovered the expansion of the universe..
@iambryaen
@@iambryaen1 months ago
Im surprised this got that many views, lol.. never ask an atheist about the history of mankind. They literally think we were blobs of cells that became this smart over time because mother nature just naturally makes living, breathing, conscious beings over time because its just a natural thing for her to do. Hahahahaha!
@EveryHappening
@@EveryHappening1 months ago
I never thought there would be a set big enough for both their heads to be in close proximity. Fascinating in and of itself. And that’s before the buffoonery that will undoubtedly ensure during the conversation. Can’t wait for the life altering drivel I’m about to not take the time to listen to. Haha.
@philipkdick2
@@philipkdick21 months ago
I see no contradiction in supposing that a higher being caused life to spring from primordial slime and created humans through evolution. Genesis presents an image of God as resembling humans—with hands that mold clay—yet the prohibition against depicting God implies that He bears no resemblance to anything we can perceive with our senses. In the Bible, numbers often carry symbolic meaning; for instance, when Jesus speaks of forgiving &quot;seventy times seven,&quot; He does not mean forgiving exactly 490 times, but rather forgiving without limit. We can therefore assume that the seven days of creation in Genesis are symbolic; to claim they are days like our own would be to reduce God to the level of a mere human.
@earth_sunlove
@@earth_sunlove1 months ago
Jimmy Carter was the only half decent leader that north America, ever had
@powerandpivot
@@powerandpivot1 months ago
Jimmy Carter is responsible for the chaos in the Middle East nowadays. I wish you hadn&#39;t voted for him. He helped the Islamic Demonic regime of Iran overthrow the Shah, and the chaos in the Middle East started with that.
@mrmass144
@@mrmass1441 months ago
Religion and science are entirely different fields. Yet, I often hear intellectuals—whether religious or non-religious—trying to connect the two or make them compatible, even though they deal with fundamentally different kinds of questions.
@Masayasu-b2o
@@Masayasu-b2o1 months ago
when Richard Dawkins said &quot; the blind watch maker&quot; all I could think of is that idiotic apologist Suboor Ahmad.
@skovvy729
@@skovvy7291 months ago
Tyson will never be a good interviewer, he loves the sound of his own voice too much. It’s incredible how opinionated he is even in a short interview with Dawkins. Alas
@PeterFarrell-w8c
@@PeterFarrell-w8c1 months ago
The fundamental fact in life is some scientists are saying one thing about humanity existence  an on the other hand some are saying something differently.<br>Religion often creates deep contradictions within ourselves and country. It can unite people through shared values. At the same time, it can divide groups because beliefs differ.<br>Uncovering historical truth challenges our assumptions and expands our understanding clearly generally agree that while absolute objectivity is difficult, exploring evidence helps society re-evaluate past narratives and broaden its perspective.<br>The truth found in history expands our minds by challenging old beliefs, revealing how past choices shape the present, and teaching us to see the world from multiple viewpoints. As a collective memory, history acts as a laboratory for human thought and action.<br>The truth is history open our mind and allow some of us to be analytical to make a determination about Life or life existence.<br>Some people have to learn to BULLETPROOF their minds from existential forces, because of the misleading behavior of the some other&#39;s greed.<br>Because of these people behavior some people feel tired of living, their main wish is often to end their pain, not necessarily life itself. They feel overwhelmed by heavy stress, sadness, or hard times. This deep exhaustion can lead to thoughts of giving up or wanting it all to stop. Much more can be said...
@nigelperry8863
@@nigelperry88631 months ago
I think a lot of people &#39;got it&#39;, but were afraid of being burnt at the stake. By the time of Darwin, an enlightement was taking place, and Darwin was the first to publish.
@dragonlock12345
@@dragonlock123451 months ago
Dawkins sounds like an AI chatbot...
@philipkdick2
@@philipkdick21 months ago
Analyzing the laws of nature might not tell us anything about whether the universe is designed; a higher entity could create different universes with different rules, just as mathematicians create different mathematical systems by varying the postulates.
@philipkdick2
@@philipkdick21 months ago
Science does not deny that the universe could be created; it might be a computer simulation or the dream of a Boltzmann brain. The real issue at hand is whether free will is possible within the universe. In certain reductionist philosophical models, natural laws leave no room for free action by a human or a higher being, yet quantum randomness leaves a small opening; indeed, during World War II, Turing calculated how the decrypted information from German messages could be utilized without alerting the Germans that their code had been broken.
@philipkdick2
@@philipkdick21 months ago
The question concerns free will; Dawkins denies its existence, implying there is no room in the universe for an autonomous entity. Chance and evolution can be used to design—much like in evolutionary algorithms. The definition of &quot;design&quot; shifts with technological advancement. Chance is not a fundamental force of nature; it merely marks the limit of what we can know—it is a phenomenon, not the <b>noumenon</b> (in the Kantian sense). Quantum theory and relativity contradict each other, yet this does not render them false; it simply limits their respective scopes of application.
@EyeNoreten
@@EyeNoreten1 months ago
Not only are the livings evolving. From stars to galaxies and from concepts to reality. I think beyond our comprehension is a vast, primordial, old evolution
@Demunderfire
@@Demunderfire1 months ago
Richard Dawkins fails at that moment, when he takes the word &quot;truth&quot; in his mouth. It is so unscientific, that it makes him a priest of his own religion. Especially in evolutionary biology. A field that is so wide and still unexplored. Science is a tool, not the truth. You hinder the progress of science by creating &quot;truths&quot;.
<br>Neil deGrasse Tyson is much purer a scientist, because he more often comunicates the boundaries of science.<br>Still a very good conversation between a scientist and a bishop of darwinism.
@drdecker1
@@drdecker11 months ago
You really have to laugh at those who believe everything just puffed into this world without design or thought given in its creation, lol !! No one is surprised by this truth because the best-selling book in the world reveals it to them. God reminded them they rejected it. The other side of it is this truth. God is highly intelligent because he&#39;s all-knowing. The devil is a former angel who had to look into things. In other words, he had to research and try to find out what makes things tick in the universe. Like a car mechanic who has to figure out what makes a car tick. The creator of that car understands it. God is intelligent and knows exactly what he created. In fact, Jesus would often go outside the boundaries of human thinking. Did things that a lot of scientists are still trying to figure out how he accomplished it. Like opening the eyes of the blind, ears of the deaf and raising the dead without having to look it up in some book. Because there are no books on this science, only the bible. All kept in only the mind of God. Proving he is much more intelligent than these so-called scientists who appear to know everything by fighting God with lies! What is even more amazing is that even Einstein, after looking into the design of things he discovered such perfection. He said only an intelligent mind could create such a creation.