When do arms exports violate international law? | DW News - Vidnexa
Create Account
VidNexa
Up next
 
00:00 / 00:00
QualityAutochevron_right
Playback speedchevron_right
Audio trackchevron_right
Chapterschevron_right
Autoplay On
Loop Off
Sticky player Off
Sleep timerOffchevron_right
Subtitles/CC On
Stats for nerds
Sleep timer ended
⏪ 10s
⏩ 10s

When do arms exports violate international law? | DW News

476 views • 3 days ago
admin
4 subscribers
10 Comments
@Zbear4
@@Zbear4 3 days ago
Japan launched a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor and ultimately lost World War II. Yet, not only did Japan avoid paying reparations to the U.S., but—under American protection—it escaped being carved up by China and Russia and saw its economy revived and prosper. Today, Japan ought to pay reparations for its defeat, and the U.S. should confiscate the plutonium and uranium stocks Japan holds—materials sufficient to produce 5,000 nuclear warheads. Otherwise, should Japan ever build nuclear weapons, it might well act on the deep-seated resentment the Japanese people harbor over the U.S. dropping two atomic bombs on them. Trump has the guts to simply confiscate Japan's nuclear materials and sell them to American nuclear power plants.
@sukrutarkak8882
@@sukrutarkak8882 3 days ago
Germany and genocide. You cant stay away from genocide.
@suzannekdavis8590
@@suzannekdavis8590 3 days ago
Works for me. Giving away bullets, missiles, LAND MINES should always be evil. But post war consequences also need to be paid.
@SchantzFIGU
@@SchantzFIGU 3 days ago
Trump and America are complicit in Gaza.
@berndbarty
@@berndbarty 3 days ago
Germany somehow ends up on the wrong side again. Last century they were leading on the genocidal side, this century they are cheering on the worst murderous gang.
@Memovox
@@Memovox 3 days ago
It reeks from a bad conscience when Germany throws whatever weight around it has left to prevent itself from having prove their innocence before the ICJ.
@TheUncomfortableTruth-u2j
@@TheUncomfortableTruth-u2j 3 days ago
Is the guest saying that if Germany stops sending weapons, it is innocent, even if the genocide has been already committed?
@joputhiyaparambil07
@@joputhiyaparambil07 3 days ago
Germany is not just complicit, they&#39;re cheerleeding the genocide.<br><br>Nobody should be surprised, after all that what Germany do.
@liemto9485
@@liemto9485 3 days ago
- The US holds an advantage in Venezuela and Cuba, THE USA must ensure fairness in investment cooperation and deliver tangible benefits to the populations of both nations.
<br>- If the US can stabilize the Middle East—a region long plagued by instability—by compelling regional powers (including Iran, Israel, and Arab nations) to sign a nuclear non-proliferation treaty...
<br>- If the US can disarm Hamas and Hezbollah while Israel withdraws its troops from Palestine and Lebanon, allowing UN peacekeeping forces to step in and maintain order in those areas...
<br>- Greenland would only come under US control if its people voluntarily agreed or if the US purchased the territory.
@EddieScouser
@@EddieScouser 3 days ago
Germany committed genocide in Namibia, Germany committed the holocaust, Germany is helping Israel commit genocide; Germany seems to have a thing for genocide. Palestinians are effectively paying the price for Germany carrying out the holocaust.