FIREWORKS as Lindsay Clancy judge SPARS with defense attorney - Vidnexa
Create Account
VidNexa
Up next
 
00:00 / 00:00
QualityAutochevron_right
Playback speedchevron_right
Audio trackchevron_right
Chapterschevron_right
Autoplay On
Loop Off
Sticky player Off
Sleep timerOffchevron_right
Subtitles/CC On
Stats for nerds
Sleep timer ended
⏪ 10s
⏩ 10s

FIREWORKS as Lindsay Clancy judge SPARS with defense attorney

322 views • 1 week ago
admin
4 subscribers
100 Comments
@carenlee3612
@@carenlee3612 1 weeks ago
The defense lawyer should be charged with intimidation of jurors already!
@Name-s7w8v
@@Name-s7w8v 1 weeks ago
A juror has the duty to vote after hearing all of the evidence, not every juror will always agree. The defense should be happy with a hold out. Having them removed does not help her.
@DSage-03
@@DSage-03 1 weeks ago
The Judge doesn&#39;t get to tell the jurors how to vote.<br>The judge does not instruct jurors on how to vote; instead, jurors are expected to make their decisions based on the evidence presented during the trial. The judge&#39;s role is to ensure the trial is conducted fairly and to provide legal guidance, but the final verdict is determined by the jury&#39;s deliberation.
@MasterofScrutiny
@@MasterofScrutiny 1 weeks ago
So now the defense attorney &quot;instructs&quot; the judge?
@TLJShabazz
@@TLJShabazz 1 weeks ago
No excuse to not have a sequestered jury
@QUENTIN1955-e8n
@@QUENTIN1955-e8n 1 weeks ago
Strangulation to literally squeeze the life out of somebody as you look them in the eyes , that&#39;s who this man is protecting, that&#39;s why this man is a child of a w*<b>*</b>
@CosmycGamingYT
@@CosmycGamingYT 1 weeks ago
either way she is gonna be locked up for life just in a mental institution
@elyducasse
@@elyducasse 1 weeks ago
Never seen anything like it. What makes him think that juror is aNot Following the law. They want to force him to a particular opinion
@HealedEthereal
@@HealedEthereal 1 weeks ago
It is against the ABA code of conduct in a several ways for this defense attorney to be coercing or otherwise pushing the judge to force consensus on a jury. It is HIGHLY inappropriate and unethical.
@tatianaleatherman659
@@tatianaleatherman659 1 weeks ago
There’s a movie called the verdict and this exact of what happened like literally what happened in that movie with gene hackman
@GimpOG
@@GimpOG 1 weeks ago
As much as I want to see those babies get justice, they&#39;ll be martyrs if she&#39;s found not guilty or liable and this will be the catalyst to repeal the 19th amendment and women&#39;s rights
@tamifedorak4093
@@tamifedorak4093 1 weeks ago
Judge is scared to make the move he lawfully should. Cult
@johnfrost5787
@@johnfrost5787 1 weeks ago
So do this simple - call a mistrial and require each juror to reveal how they voted!
@seriously1184
@@seriously1184 1 weeks ago
the judge and this lawyer have no right to instruct and influence any juror for whatever reason<br><br>until now the judge and this lawyer have interfered with the workings of the jury<br><br>to expose this juror as the only one who holds their conviction in spite the tremendous pressure of the other eleven jurors and the judge and this lawyer is already more than enough reason for a mistrial
@JoeToz
@@JoeToz 1 weeks ago
Sorry but I have to ask if Donna is blinking for help. I couldn’t stop staring at her blinking the entire time. <br>How about they replace the other 11 jurors that don’t agree with the 1 juror?
@usavietnamesetranslationse8078
@@usavietnamesetranslationse8078 1 weeks ago
Shame on the other two male jurors who gave in. What kind of justice is that for the three poor angels whose lives were taken in cold blood?
@Dallhouse53
@@Dallhouse53 1 weeks ago
If Mr Reddington “knows” the juror is a male he is out of order by a long shot.<br>Just because the jury note says what it did does not make it fact.<br><br>The instructions are not the judge’s, they are the law.
@MikeOxlongerthanyourz
@@MikeOxlongerthanyourz 1 weeks ago
REPEAL THE 19TH
@YellowPissStain
@@YellowPissStain 1 weeks ago
19th Amendment Fatigue
@DSage-03
@@DSage-03 1 weeks ago
On Friday, the jury returned for a seventh day of deliberations in the case against Lindsay Clancy. Before the jurors entered the courtroom, the defense and judge got into a heated debate over the alleged holdout juror. The defense accused the juror of “lying to the judge,” while the state said it was comfortable with the jury returning to deliberate. The judge ultimately decided to give the jury instructions once again before sending them back to deliberate.
@richardcatalinajr.369
@@richardcatalinajr.369 1 weeks ago
The hold juror not finding reasonable doubt is a hero. Justice for the three murdered children!
@devilmangamez8615
@@devilmangamez8615 1 weeks ago
Let them find this woman not guilty. Soon after, we will be coming for all women&#39;s rights since your hormones makes you not liable for killing kids. Definitely not winning another custody case either. We will be trying to take away your right to vote and everything else. You ladies wanted this. We are just giving it to you
@jamiestinnett9872
@@jamiestinnett9872 1 weeks ago
That one juror speaks for us ALL
@mikekamrowski5058
@@mikekamrowski5058 1 weeks ago
Only in America can you admit to killing three people and still potentially be found not guilty.
@SunshineHoward
@@SunshineHoward 1 weeks ago
so wait a minute, Reddington does NOT know which way this is going. He is assuming the number is in his favor? Why would he do this and nobody stop him? further the hold out sounds as if they have applied reasonable doubt whichever way he/she is thinking.
@glorioskiola
@@glorioskiola 1 weeks ago
Wow, incredible. The defense wants to replace a juror just because he doesn’t agree with the others. The judge is correct here. “Beyond reasonable doubt” doesn’t mean “beyond any doubt.” It’s shocking that only one person sees defense games.
@jacquikk181
@@jacquikk181 1 weeks ago
11 angry men
@DissoluteGambler
@@DissoluteGambler 1 weeks ago
There was a famous case in Baltimore where they got a conviction but one of the jurors wanted to talk to the prosecutor afterwards about what went down.
<br>
<br>When they went in to deliberate and had gotten the preliminaries done and the foreman asked the jurors what they wanted to do already. Eight of the jurors said they didn&#39;t care what the vedict was and the other four could debate the issues and they would vote for whatever those four decided. That was 2 and 2 so they argued it out until the 2 who knew they were guilty finally got the other 2 to vote guilty and then 8 jurors true of heart voted along with them.
<br>
<br>Remember that if you ever have to go to trial. Most jurors don&#39;t care if you&#39;re guilty or innocent. They just want to get along and get it over. It isn&#39;t 12 angry men. It&#39;s 12 people who aren&#39;t smart enough to get out of jury duty.
@lilmama4426
@@lilmama4426 1 weeks ago
So bad he wants the judge to not only read the instructions but he should “emphasize certain points” that will help boost the defense instead of staying impartial…..the judge ain’t her attorney.🫩
@HOWdr1
@@HOWdr1 1 weeks ago
This Defense attorney is EVIL. She is guilty that&#39;s not questioned, This get off due to magical insanity that only happened when she murdered the Children??? My God convict her and let&#39;s go
@janesansome8393
@@janesansome8393 1 weeks ago
She isn&#39;t the victim her children were.
@joypeterson3162
@@joypeterson3162 1 weeks ago
There’s a famous way now for that note to be HANDLED , this judge SHOULD to be used for REDACTION 😂😂😂😂😂😂THIS WAs DELIBERATELY DONE TO INTIMIDATE THE JURORS 💥💥💥💥
@AeroMetalRush
@@AeroMetalRush 1 weeks ago
Saying that Lindsey Clancy is innocent is like saying that Joe Biden is a great president
@markclifford3784
@@markclifford3784 1 weeks ago
Judge is being BULLIED AND TAKING IT! HOW SHAMEFUL!!!!!!!!!
@DSage-03
@@DSage-03 1 weeks ago
Testimony about the mental competence of a defendant should not be admissible in trials. Psychiatrists testifying about the mental state of an accused person&#39;s mind have about as much business as a priest testifying about the religious state of a person&#39;s soul in our courts. Insanity was a legal tactic invented to circumvent the punishments of the Church, which at the time included confiscation of the property of those who committed suicide, often leaving widows and orphans destitute. Only an insane person would do such a thing to his widow and children, it was successfully argued. This is legal mercy masquerading as medicine, according to Szasz.[24]
@katiedetmer7037
@@katiedetmer7037 1 weeks ago
Sullivan is bought 💯
@SavageB-lr7hs
@@SavageB-lr7hs 1 weeks ago
This feels like another Casey Anthony verdict
@moosemieserMoose
@@moosemieserMoose 1 weeks ago
We are all over this murderer and her evil t wat fans
@mariaphilomena1422
@@mariaphilomena1422 1 weeks ago
What this one hold out Juror is doing is actually proof that they are following the law!!!!! Redington is not!
@thebestisahead7331
@@thebestisahead7331 1 weeks ago
Let&#39;s get this straight. &quot;She killed her children because she&#39;s crazy. But she won&#39;t be convicted because she&#39;s crazy&quot;. The new Catch-22.
@duaneasistido2915
@@duaneasistido2915 1 weeks ago
you know what is crazy. if she comes out and wins this. Now we can use this case to not hire women anywhere, since they are hormonal and everything. you can even use this against female enforcers. You cant even have a female judge because how can a hormonal person judge if they are not in the right mind.
@jessemeyer3628
@@jessemeyer3628 1 weeks ago
She isnt locked up already? Mistrial. Im done with this victim mentality to escape accountability.
@lasersbee
@@lasersbee 1 weeks ago
I was wrong... Seems like it&#39;s a MALE Juror.... Is he voting Guilty or Not Guilty....?
@markclifford3784
@@markclifford3784 1 weeks ago
The same thing that happened to those BABY&#39;S needs to be done to both HER and that LOSER OF A LAWYER FAST!!!! By accident lol!!!
@DSage-03
@@DSage-03 1 weeks ago
In a criminal trial, the defense can request that a juror be removed for cause if the juror cannot follow the law or is biased, but the judge decides whether to grant the request; the defense can also use a limited number of peremptory challenges to remove jurors without stating a cause.
@Joshtow167
@@Joshtow167 1 weeks ago
Get rid of a juror naw don’t be a baby this is what we pay for and u get paid to do.
@chops5084
@@chops5084 1 weeks ago
This countrys gone to hell
@DonPerry-g5s
@@DonPerry-g5s 1 weeks ago
Lawyer is use to bullying a jury
@lindacastner523
@@lindacastner523 1 weeks ago
If the jury comes back with no verdict, it is time for a mistrial! It cannot be tried again because of so much publicity! This jury should have been sequestered from the beginning!
@Judy-zl5sk
@@Judy-zl5sk 1 weeks ago
That attorney is out of order. That juror has every right to its vote
@petermacander5039
@@petermacander5039 1 weeks ago
Judge William F. Sullivan has done his duty in a fair and impartial way. He has already spoken to the jury and given the &quot;reasonable doubt&quot; instructions to the jury 3 times this week. That is enough.   Any more would give the distinct impression of coercion and jury tampering by the judge to hand Kevin Reddington a corrupt victory.
@rickdees651
@@rickdees651 1 weeks ago
its 11-1 for guilty the hold out is a non guilty that lawyers dont know what side they fall into
@GatorTree
@@GatorTree 1 weeks ago
Bro who is the atty. sit tf down
@yourkeysre
@@yourkeysre 1 weeks ago
Probability. 9 female on jury. Pro- Lancey. Wearing their heart on their sleeve. Siding with the perpetrator.
@katiedetmer7037
@@katiedetmer7037 1 weeks ago
Someone has Sullivan ober a barrel. Crooked AF.
@TkoddaLee
@@TkoddaLee 1 weeks ago
😂😂😂😂seem like Women can always count on their hormones to shield them from any accountability
@intmd346
@@intmd346 1 weeks ago
I can understand a split jury. But. Just one against?!?! Wow i wish i was in that jury room
@lalalovesslots8594
@@lalalovesslots8594 1 weeks ago
That lady is going to end herself the 1st chance she gets ... Shame ....this case is absolutely horrible ...
@cosanostra4229
@@cosanostra4229 1 weeks ago
This defense attorney is on demon time
@Shiloh-j4g
@@Shiloh-j4g 1 weeks ago
Sodom only had one righteous man...
@SomePoorSap
@@SomePoorSap 1 weeks ago
The problem lies in the fact you could select a new jury every day and get a different verdict 50% of the time. Depending on who they select, you could get 12-0 in favor of the defense or 12-0 in favor of the prosecutor. This isn&#39;t justice, it&#39;s RNG.
@frank33607
@@frank33607 1 weeks ago
Defense attorney should stop complaining. He is not stating any law statutes.
@thetruthchannel349
@@thetruthchannel349 1 weeks ago
The jury is going on social media. In fact, there is no question. They are.
@mattfoley6082
@@mattfoley6082 1 weeks ago
<b>Trending on Spotify: How Do you Solve a Problem Like Maria</b>
@Bartholomeow141
@@Bartholomeow141 1 weeks ago
I&#39;m still not sure why the two &quot;jurors&quot; who wore pink in support of the murdering mother were not instantly removed. And how they made it thru the selection process boggles the imagination
@markclifford3784
@@markclifford3784 1 weeks ago
He needs to MEET A WINDSHIELD!!!!!!!
@4EverTruth
@@4EverTruth 1 weeks ago
Is she handicapped?
@PaulKeogh-u1h
@@PaulKeogh-u1h 1 weeks ago
The Demise of America 😢😢😢
@wandag9890
@@wandag9890 1 weeks ago
That woman should accept the responsability of her acts, but she does&#39;nt have a mother&#39;s heart. No sign of real remorse. She&#39;s suffering for herself and not for what he did.
@anng.4542
@@anng.4542 1 weeks ago
Donna Rotunno 👎👎👎
@roachlarry1488
@@roachlarry1488 1 weeks ago
@<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHvrPs_tb_c&amp;t=44">0:44</a> he said &quot;she&quot;! ITS A WOMAN HOLD OUT
@Kentucky.Tactical
@@Kentucky.Tactical 1 weeks ago
Our country has been overtaken by evil. This manifested directly from the 19th Amendment. This birthed feminism and liberalism. Now we have millions of woman that are openly supporting a witch that murdered her 3 young children. Feminism and Liberalism are proxies for evil to thrive.
@rajpat89
@@rajpat89 1 weeks ago
The defense attorney is certainly earning his money in this trial lol
@MartiGraw-t2e
@@MartiGraw-t2e 1 weeks ago
Think about how long it takes to strangle.. <br>X 3..
@joypeterson3162
@@joypeterson3162 1 weeks ago
Talk about Ply ing the mouth !!!!!
@matthewstump7563
@@matthewstump7563 1 weeks ago
They better be glad I am not that one juror. The court would hear it from me.
@Iacon40k
@@Iacon40k 1 weeks ago
I guess I&#39;m just confused about what&#39;s so hard about this. The woman murdered all of her children, doesn&#39;t matter if she had a manic episode. The only issue should be if she&#39;s going to spend the rest of her life in Prison or the nut house.
@lasersbee
@@lasersbee 1 weeks ago
Freaking Song and Dance.... She&#39;s Guilty 3 times....
@12kurban
@@12kurban 1 weeks ago
Reddington is a jackass
@legionse7en448
@@legionse7en448 1 weeks ago
The fact that Lindsey admitted to murdering her children and the defense admitted that Lindsey murdered her children and that there are 11 people that are in firm belief beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsey is not guilty is absolutely disturbing, disgusting, grotesque, demonic, and evil.
@lovesjustice6918
@@lovesjustice6918 1 weeks ago
The judge is too soft on the defense attorney.
@Secretforest2
@@Secretforest2 1 weeks ago
Jurors are suppose to be allowed to vote whatever way he or she wants, Neither the Judge or the Defense can Force that one individual to vote their way! Judge needs to declare a Mistrial and have the Prosecution offer the defense a Plea Deal! BUT under no circumstances is she to be set Free!
@taylorshelp5046
@@taylorshelp5046 1 weeks ago
AMBULANCE CHASER!
@Francis-xn6bs
@@Francis-xn6bs 1 weeks ago
I try not to involve myself in this kind of crap. But not paying much intention I just realized my verdict is backwards. 11 actually want her off? Only 1-one MAN is actually doing the moral
@vta3dr1216
@@vta3dr1216 1 weeks ago
How about Fox propaganda interview some truck drivers, farmers, beef ranchers, fisherman or any other person tRumps and this republican party is royally screwing. Record diesel prices is destroying companies and making everything skyrocket in price.<br>Forever war. Higher utility and Healthcare costs. <br>Keep turning red districts BLUE and save our country!
@david-vf5cb
@@david-vf5cb 1 weeks ago
WOW!!! Today they are actually saying the lone juror is a &quot;man&quot;. That doesn&#39;t seem fair to disclose that.
@crystalbayer4036
@@crystalbayer4036 1 weeks ago
Isaiah 5:20 😢😢😢
@terrys.1401
@@terrys.1401 1 weeks ago
Why does the commentator think they have to repeat EVERYTHING we just heard?
@caseymay5449
@@caseymay5449 1 weeks ago
It is unreasonable to not get a guilty verdict
@taylorshelp5046
@@taylorshelp5046 1 weeks ago
That ambulance chaser defense attorney needs disbarred. You can&#39;t force a juror to agree with you!!! If the juror was not convinced does not make it illegal...old petrified fck
@mallyh6449
@@mallyh6449 1 weeks ago
Go Red!
@geoffreymilke5176
@@geoffreymilke5176 1 weeks ago
The defense attorney is trying to &quot;fix&quot; the trial for his defendant! He is as evil as his murderous client
@LawrenceAllen-xj9sb
@@LawrenceAllen-xj9sb 1 weeks ago
Weak judge. She&#39;ll walk free. Yeah, she will walk. I don&#39;t buy the wheelchair one bit.
@jessicaw6930
@@jessicaw6930 1 weeks ago
At this point just call for a mistrial and start again with a good whole new jury
@angiep5514
@@angiep5514 1 weeks ago
Attorney needs to be charged with contempt of court. He&#39;s ridiculous! Judge is afraid of this bully. Someone from the federal government needs to step in.
@Mama2Bee_n_Ant
@@Mama2Bee_n_Ant 1 weeks ago
Notice how he keeps saying her.
@SuccessMindset2180
@@SuccessMindset2180 1 weeks ago
This is no TikTok
@FilPaonessa
@@FilPaonessa 1 weeks ago
is it an 11 to 1 split in favor of Linsay Clancy, or not? Is this an assumption, or is it a fact? Does anyone really know?
@reneefortier8623
@@reneefortier8623 1 weeks ago
She wanted to die she had lots of pills to take then cut herself up and jump out of window ! She would be dead along with her innocent children who looked at their mother strangling them ! Fk that mental hospital for you darling no jail but definitely mental hospital
@Ten_Mil_Will
@@Ten_Mil_Will 1 weeks ago
Sadly, if it doesn&#39;t end today, I would not be surprised if the defense tried to &quot;sand bag&quot; the juror. What I mean is - Over the weekend, have some &quot;random&quot; person approach the juror (like the reporter said, it&#39;s being discussed everywhere in town) and say something like, &quot;Wow, crazy about the neighbor&#39;s DNA being found on scene, isn&#39;t it?&quot; or some other &quot;contact&quot; that will &quot;prejudice&quot; and disqualify the juror. Seriously, consider the possibilities. Hopefully, they won&#39;t let it go on past today. That jury should have been sequestered!