Sleep timer ended
⏪ 10s
⏩ 10s
878.9K views
1 week ago Gospel
In September of 2024 I went to be a guest on the @JulianDorey podcast. Here is just a snippet of the conversation Julian and I had. To watch my full interview w…
...more
<br>The Bible is the ultimate authority in matters of faith and practice.
<br>Church tradition, councils, or leaders are not equal to Scripture.
<br>Scripture is sufficient and clear for salvation.
<br>2. Sola Fide (“Faith Alone”) Romans 3:28; Ephesians 2:8–9; Galatians 2:16
<br>People are justified (declared righteous before God) by faith alone, not by works.
<br>Good works are the result of salvation, not the cause.
<br>3. Sola Gratia (“Grace Alone”) Ephesians 2:8; Romans 11:6; Titus 3:5
<br>Salvation is entirely a gift of God’s grace, not something earned.
<br>Humans cannot save themselves; it is God who initiates and completes salvation.
<br>4. Solus Christus (“Christ Alone”) John 14:6; Acts 4:12; 1 Timothy 2:5
<br>Jesus Christ is the only mediator between God and humanity.
<br>Salvation comes only through Christ, not through priests, saints, or other intermediaries.
<br>5. Soli Deo Gloria (“To the Glory of God Alone”) 1 Corinthians 10:31; Romans 11:36; Ephesians 1:11–12
<br>All of life—including salvation—is for God’s glory alone.
<br>No human (including religious leaders) deserves ultimate glory.
<br>
<br>Sin (*hamartia*) is not an ontological state of being. It is a state of forgetfulness. It is missing the mark of one's divine origin. Christ did not come to fix a "broken" species through a blood transaction. He came to reveal the true identity of the human spirit.
<br>
<br>The Light: John 1:9 states that the true Light gives light to <b>every</b> human.
<br>The Temple:Paul asks in 1 Corinthians 6:19, "Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit?" A temple is not inherently evil. It is a sacred space that may be clouded by ignorance.
<br>
<br>The speaker claims God requires a penalty. He suggests the Father cannot "just forgive" without a death. This portrays the Father as a prisoner to a higher law of "Justice."
<br>
<br><b>Christ as the Example:</b>
<br>Jesus repeatedly forgave sins without a sacrifice. In *Mark 2:5*, he tells the paralytic, "Your sins are forgiven." He does not wait for the cross to authorize this. He does not demand a goat or a ritual. Forgiveness is an act of the Father's nature. It is not a result of a payment.
<br>
<br>The word often translated as "sacrifice" is <b>Korban</b> (קָרְבָּן). This comes from the root *karav*, meaning "to draw near." The purpose was never to appease a violent God. It was a symbolic act of bringing one's self closer to the Divine.
<br>
<br>Jesus is the *Logos*. He is the living embodiment of divine consciousness. He did not step into "depravity" to be punished. He entered the human experience to demonstrate the path of *Union*.
<br>
<br>The cross was not a payment to the Father. It was a demonstration of the Father’s love. It showed that even at the height of human violence and ignorance, the Divine remains whole. Resurrection is the proof that our true life is untouchable by the systems of this world.
<br>
<br>The speaker calls humanity the "weakest." He says Christ is the "fittest" who dies for us. This is a hierarchy of shame. Christ calls us <b>friends</b> (*John 15:15*). He does not call us "the weakest." He invites us to do the same works he did. He seeks to share his glory with us (*John 17:22*).
<br>
<br>We do not need a sacrifice to be "accepted." We are accepted because we are His. The spiritual journey is the unveiling of what is already hidden within. It is the remembrance of our union with the Father.<br><br><br><br>The speaker describes <b>Buddhism</b> as a system to destroy the self. In reality, the concept of <b>Anatta</b> (Pali: <b>anattā*) does not mean destruction. It refers to the realization that a permanent, independent self never existed. One cannot destroy what is already recognized as an illusion. *Samsara</b> is not merely a cycle of punishment. It is a cycle of conditioned existence driven by ignorance.
<br>
<br>The speaker claims the God of <b>Islam</b> forgives arbitrarily. This ignores the Islamic concept of <b>Adl</b> (Justice). In the Quran, repentance (*tawbah*) is a sincere return to God. Mercy is not the absence of justice. It is the fulfillment of God's nature as the Most Compassionate. The speaker’s camera analogy fails because it assumes a third party must be "paid" for forgiveness to be valid.
<br>
<br>
<br>The video frames the <b>Gospel</b> as a legal transaction. It uses the "Judge" analogy to explain <b>Grace</b> (*charis*). This model focuses heavily on <b>Wrath</b> (*orgē*). However, many early traditions viewed the cross through the lens of *Christus Victor*. This view sees Jesus as a liberator from death rather than a sacrifice to appease a legalistic Father.
<br>
<br><br>The speaker claims God cannot "just forgive." This contradicts the <b>Parable of the Prodigal Son</b> in <b>Luke 15*. In that story, the father forgives the son immediately. He requires no payment or sacrifice. The father’s mercy is a direct expression of his love. *Psalm 103:12</b> states that God removes sins as far as the east is from the west. This is described as a gift of love, not a settled debt.
<br>
<br>The speaker uses the term <b>Trinity</b> to explain Jesus taking the penalty. The word <b>Trinity</b> never appears in scripture. While the divinity of Christ is central to the New Testament, the idea of the "second person" suffering to satisfy the "first person" is a later medieval development. It is not the only way to understand the *Atonement*.
<br>
<br>Christian theology attempts to escape this by claiming God defines good and evil by fiat. But definition by power is not morality, it is dominance. If “good” merely means “whatever God does,” then the term loses all moral content and becomes tautological. A standard that is set by a being and violated by that same being is not a standard at all. It is exemption disguised as authority. Moral authority that applies only downward is indistinguishable from tyranny. The Bible compounds this problem by asserting that humanity is created in the image of God. If this image includes moral attributes, then human tendencies toward violence, jealousy, and domination must reflect divine characteristics. If those traits are condemned in humans but permitted in God, then punishment becomes incoherent. One cannot justly condemn a reflection for resembling its source.
<br>
<br>If, instead, humans are punished for exhibiting traits that originate in God, then creation itself is unjust. Responsibility would lie with the designer, not the design. If the image of God excludes moral likeness, then the phrase “created in God’s image” becomes meaningless and reduced to a vague metaphor with no explanatory power. Thus, every attempt to reconcile divine morality with human punishment results in contradiction: either injustice, incoherence, or semantic collapse. The problem deepens when God is portrayed as demanding moral behavior that contradicts his own actions. Acts such as genocide, deception, and collective punishment are condemned among humans yet celebrated or excused when attributed to God. This is not moral transcendence. Transcendence would imply a higher coherence, not a lower one. A morality that requires constant exception clauses is not higher; it is lower and unstable.
<br>
<br>The appeal to “mystery” does not resolve this instability. Mystery can excuse ignorance, but it cannot justify contradiction. A thing may be beyond understanding without being self-contradictory; the Biblical God is both. Nature provides an unspoken counterargument. The natural order exhibits continuity, causality, and proportionality. Whatever God is, if God exists, that order would be an expression of his nature. A true God would not need to violate the structure of reality to assert authority. To constantly suspend natural law is to imply that the law is not truly divine, or that God is at odds with his own creation. The Biblical God regularly acts against nature rather than through it. Miracles are framed as interruptions rather than expressions. Faith is framed as belief despite evidence rather than understanding through it.
<br>
<br>This places God in opposition to reality itself. But a being opposed to reality cannot be its source. That which must break the system is subordinate to the system. The demand that humans reject reason, observation, and moral intuition in favor of obedience is another signal of incoherence. Truth does not fear scrutiny; only fragile claims do. Belief, even religious belief, must still have a rational foundation. Faith without coherence is not faith, it is submission. The saying “you can’t have your cake and eat it too” expresses a universal constraint: mutually exclusive claims cannot both be true. Even quantum physics, paradoxical as it is, obeys strict mathematical consistency.